What is the Foundation Sprint?
Introduction
The Foundation Sprint is a structured, fast-paced two-day workshop designed to align teams on a clear direction at the start of big, new projects.
It helps teams clarify their assumptions about who their customer is, what problem they can solve for them, and how they will differentiate from competitors—setting the foundation to build future solutions. It’s about getting clarity on their promise and value proposition.
Developed by Jake Knapp and John Zeratsky, the Foundation Sprint is a repeatable and reliable process based on firsthand experience with some of the world’s most successful startups—many of which turned into valuable businesses worth hundreds of millions or even billions. But the process is equally effective in large organizations, provided some pitfalls are avoided, as highlighted in this article: Avoiding Pitfalls: Making Foundation Sprints Work in Large Organizations
At first glance, the process appears simple. But when something that looks simple is also effective and powerful, that takes sophistication. Beneath the streamlined surface lies a deep strategic layer and a certain level of complexity in execution, which we’ll explore in this article.
At its core, the Foundation Sprint is about getting started, not getting it perfect.
It forces teams to articulate their vision clearly, cutting through months of meetings, indecision, and misalignment to create real momentum from day one.
How it Works: The Two-Day Breakdown
The Foundation Sprint condenses strategic decision-making into two focused days.
Day 1: Defining the Foundation
The first day of the sprint is about making sure everyone is on the same page regarding the fundamentals: customer, problem, competition, and what makes the solution different.
- Customer & Problem: Who is your real customer, and what pain point are you solving for them?
- Your Unique Advantage: What strengths does your team bring that competitors can’t match?
- Competition & Differentiation: Who else is trying to solve this problem? What makes your solution radically different?
- Project Principles: Create clear, practical decision-making guidelines to keep your strategy focused.
By the end of Day 1, the team has a Mini Manifesto—a concise articulation of the opportunity and what sets it apart.
Where Things Can Go Wrong
At first glance, this part of the sprint seems simple, but it’s also where teams can easily go off track.
The Foundation Sprint doesn’t include deep problem exploration, customer research, or discovery work.
It relies entirely on the team’s existing knowledge—which is why it’s critical that the right people are in the room.
The process was originally designed for startups, where founders typically have deep expertise in the problem space and a strong understanding of their customers and competitors. In large organizations, however, teams may lack this immediate context, leading to misalignment.
To get meaningful results, the workshop must be anchored in a well-defined initiative, project, or problem space. If the team lacks shared knowledge, pre-work—or a Problem Framing session—may be necessary to ensure everyone enters the sprint with a solid foundation.
The Trap of Deceptive Simplicity
Another area where teams struggle is identifying their unique advantage.
A unique advantage isn’t just about strengths—it’s a combination of three things:
- Capability – What the team is good at.
- Motivation – What drives them forward.
- Insight – A deep understanding of the problem and the customer.
The first two are relatively easy to define. But insight—as Jake Knapp describes it, and I completely agree—is a deep understanding of the problem and of customers.
This is easier for startups, where teams focus on a single big problem and one customer type. But in large organizations, where teams are often far removed from customers, insight is harder to come by.
If the team lacks real insight at this stage, it must be provided through pre-work, such as customer research, past data, or prior discovery efforts. Without it, the workshop risks being built on assumptions rather than real understanding.
Day 2: Choosing an Approach
Once the foundation is set, Day 2 is about exploring alternative approaches and picking the best path forward.
- Generate multiple options: Before locking in a solution, consider at least three approaches.
- Evaluate using ‘Magic Lenses’: Examine potential solutions from different perspectives—customer experience, ease of implementation, revenue potential, and competitive positioning.
- Decide on the best starting point: Choose a primary approach and a backup plan (in case pivots are needed).
- Form a Founding Hypothesis: A clear, testable statement outlining the customer, problem, solution approach, and differentiation.
At the end of the sprint, the team has a testable strategy—a hypothesis that can be validated with real customers before significant resources are committed.
Why Day 2 is More Straightforward
Compared to Day 1, this second day is much more structured and easier to navigate. By now, the team is firmly in the solution space, which—let’s be honest—is where people feel most comfortable. The process is clear and logical, guiding the team step by step toward a mutually agreed approach.
Unlike Day 1, you can’t really get this wrong. That doesn’t mean the solutions you develop will work 100% of the time—but you will walk away with full confidence in a strategic direction.
The rigor of the process ensures that teams don’t just settle on the first idea.
Instead, they challenge assumptions, explore alternatives, and evaluate solutions from different perspectives.
And at the end of the day, the goal isn’t perfection—it’s progress. The Founding Hypothesis is a best guess, not a guaranteed solution. It still needs to be tested and validated through experiments, such as follow-up Design Sprints.
Purpose: When Should You Use a Foundation Sprint?
The Foundation Sprint is not about deep problem discovery or exploring multiple directions in depth. If that’s where you are I would recommend starting with Problem Framing. I covered in the previous sections of this article why problem understanding and context are critical to make to a successful Foundation Sprint.
A Foundation Sprint is about alignment—getting the team to a shared understanding of what they believe about their customer, problem, competitive edge and what their approach to solution might be.
You should run a Foundation Sprint when:
- Starting a new project and needing clarity on direction.
- You have a solution in mind but need to refine it and consider alternatives.
- A team is misaligned about the target customer, problem, and potential solutions.
- You need speed—instead of months of meetings, you get clarity in two days.
When a Foundation Sprint Is (and Isn’t) the Right Fit
Not every new project is a good fit for a Foundation Sprint. It works best for big initiatives when stakes are high—especially when a wrong approach could carry significant risk. If the consequences of failure are high and missteps are costly, investing two days in defining the best approach is well worth it.
The Foundation Sprint is also a great fit when the team already has a strong intuition about an approach or solution. This is what makes the method so effective—most teams naturally start with solutions instead of deeply exploring the problem. The Foundation Sprint slows them down just enough to focus on the problem, challenge assumptions, and stress-test their approach.
At the end of the day, the goal is simple: make a confident bet and set a clear direction.
The Team: Who Should Be in a Foundation Sprint?
The team is what makes or breaks the sprint. Since the goal is to make strategic decisions, having the right mix of people is essential.
A successful Foundation Sprint team strikes a balance between:
- Decision-makers & executives – Needed to set direction and make strategic calls.
- Hands-on experts – Those who envision, create, and execute solutions.
If you have only senior stakeholders, they might get stuck debating strategy without grounding their decisions in real customer insight. On the other hand, if you include only subject matter experts, the sprint may lack strategic alignment and risk being disconnected from broader business goals.
Who Should Be in the Room?
The ideal Foundation Sprint team consists of five people—keeping the group small ensures fast decision-making without unnecessary bottlenecks.
- The Decider – The person who makes the final call (e.g., founder for startups, key executive in larger enterprises).
- Customer Expert – A researcher, product manager, or marketer who deeply understands customer needs.
- Engineer or Technical Expert – To assess technical feasibility and constraints.
- Design or Product Lead – To visualize and shape the solution.
- Growth/Marketing Expert – To ensure the solution is positioned effectively against competitors.
Of course, this is just a guideline. Depending on your project, industry, or organization, you might need different roles in the room. The key is ensuring that the right perspectives are represented, so decisions are both strategic and grounded in real-world insight.
The Role of the Facilitator: The Key to a Productive Sprint
One more critical person in the sprint is the facilitator.
This is someone who:
✅ Knows how the process works and keeps the team on track.
✅ Asks the right questions and challenges the team.
✅ Prevents distractions and steers discussions toward decisions.
Without a strong facilitator, the workshop can easily derail like most meetings do—turning into circular discussions, wasted time, and no clear outcomes. A skilled facilitator ensures the sprint remains focused, efficient, and results-driven.
Key Considerations: What Makes a Foundation Sprint Work?
✅ It’s deceptively simple but requires deep thinking.
On the surface, the process is straightforward. But success comes from making clear, bold decisions, rather than falling into vague, noncommittal planning.
✅ It’s about alignment, not discovery or problem exploration.
Unlike methods such as Problem Framing, which deeply explores the problem space, the Foundation Sprint assumes the team already has some knowledge and needs to align quickly. The more experience and insight the team brings, the better the outputs.
✅ It’s not about solving a problem—it’s about choosing a direction.
The Foundation Sprint helps teams articulate what they think is the right path and move forward with testing and refinement. A Design Sprint is one of the best ways to validate and refine these early decisions.
Conclusion: Why the Foundation Sprint Matters
Most teams waste months on internal debates, slide decks, and strategy docs that lead nowhere. The Foundation Sprint eliminates this wasted time, aligning teams in just two days—giving them a clear hypothesis they can validate with customers before making big bets.
For teams looking to cut through the noise, avoid decision paralysis, and move fast, the Foundation Sprint is a proven, repeatable system to get to clarity—fast.
.jpg)
